Bargaining with Incomplete Information: An Infinite-Horizon Model with Two-Sided Uncertainty
نویسنده
چکیده
The resolution of any bargaining conflict depends crucially on the relative urgency of the agents to reach agreement and the information each agent has about the others’ preferences. This paper explores, within the context of an infinite-horizon bargaining model with two-sided uncertainty, how timing and information affect the rational behaviour of agents when commitment is not possible. Since the bargainers are uncertain about whether trade is desirable, they must communicate some of their private information before an agreement can be reached. This need for learning, due to incomplete information about preferences, results in bargaining inefficiencies: trade often occurs after costly delay. Thus, the model provides an explanation for the inefficient bargaining behaviour that appears to occur often in practice.
منابع مشابه
Searching for pure strategy equilibria in bilateral bargaining with one-sided uncertainty
The problem of finding agents’ rational strategies in bargaining with incomplete information is well known to be challenging. The literature provides a collection of results for very narrow uncertainty settings, but no generally applicable algorithm. In this paper, we focus on the alternating-offers finite horizon bargaining protocol with onesided uncertainty regarding agents’ reserve prices. W...
متن کاملNon-cooperative Bargaining with Arbitrary One-Sided Uncertainty
Non-cooperative bargaining is modeled as an extensive–form game with uncertain information and infinite actions. Its resolution is a long–standing open problem and no algorithm addressing uncertainty over multiple parameters is known. We provide an algorithm to solve bargaining with any kind of one–sided uncertainty. Our algorithm reduces a bargaining problem to a finite game, solves this last ...
متن کاملAn algorithmic game theory framework for bilateral bargaining with uncertainty
Bilateral bargaining is the most common economic transaction. Customarily, it is formulated as a non-cooperative game with uncertain-information and infinite actions (offers are real-value). Its automation is a long-standing open problem in artificial intelligence and no algorithmic methodology employable regardless of the kind of uncertainty is provided. In this paper, we provide the first ste...
متن کاملAlternating-Offers Bargaining Under One-Sided Uncertainty on Deadlines
Alternating-offers is the most prominent negotiation protocol for automatic bilateral bargaining. Nevertheless, in most settings it is still not known how two fully rational agents should behave in the protocol. In this paper we study the finite-horizon alternatingoffers protocol under one-sided uncertain deadlines. We make a novel use of backward induction in studying bargaining with uncertain...
متن کاملBelief Updating in Sequential Games of Two-Sided Incomplete Information: An Experimental Study of a Crisis Bargaining Model
We investigate theoretically and experimentally the “crisis bargaining model,” a dynamic game of two-sided incomplete information with player types drawn from a commonly known distribution. Little work has been done to analyze whether and how players update their beliefs in such games. Within the experiment we elicited beliefs from players about their opponent’s type using a proper scoring rule...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998